05 Dec 2024
Question
Genomics Databases

1. ANALYSIS

Structure and Main Content

  • Title: Genomics Databases
  • Type: Main Question within a Parliamentary Debating Session
  • Debate Context: How genomic databases should be managed, particularly concerning their designation as critical national infrastructure, and considerations around national security related to foreign relations, notably with China.

Key Discussions and Content

  • Critical National Infrastructure:
    • Focus: Designating genomic databases as part of critical infrastructure was central.
    • Concerns: Emphasis on balancing scientific advancement and national security.
  • Economic and National Security Considerations:
    • China's Role: Raised concerns about partnerships with Chinese genomics companies.
    • Protection Measures: Discussions included data protection protocols and security measures.

Policy Terms and Technical Terminology

  • Genomics Databases
  • Critical National Infrastructure
  • Data Protection and Security Training
  • Bio-economy

Named Entities

  • Primary Speakers: Mr. Alistair Carmichael, Mr. Pat McFadden
  • Organizations: BGI (mentioned in context of Chinese companies)
  • Government Entities: Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology

Related Parliamentary or Legislative Business

  • National Security Structures: Discussed within protecting the bio-economy.
  • UK Government Departments: Collaboration mentioned without specific department details.

Key Dates and Timeframes

  • Recent Discussions: The inquiry about recent governmental discussions wasn't elaborated upon for exact timeframes.

Political Positions and Stances

  • Lib Dems: Concerned about protecting British genomic interests against foreign influence.
  • Labour: Focuses on balancing economic growth with national security.

2. SPEAKER POINTS

Mr. Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrats) - Orkney and Shetland

  • Main Arguments: Advocates for caution in engaging with Chinese firms. Emphasizes the need for the UK to protect bio-economic interests.
  • Questions Raised: Asked if genomics databases will be designated as critical infrastructure. Suggested cautious engagement with Chinese entities.

Mr. Pat McFadden (Labour) - Wolverhampton South East

  • Role: Responded to the genus discussion.
  • Main Arguments: Highlighted ongoing relationships with genomic data organizations for security strategies. Emphasized dual objectives of maintaining national security while fostering economic growth.
  • Position: Supports stringent data protection protocols aligned with security guidance.

No data cited, specific legislation referenced, or additional speakers mentioned beyond primary ones related to this particular question.

Key Contributions

Original Transcript
Mr Alistair Carmichael
Orkney and Shetland
LD
Question
UIN: 901636

6. What recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology on the potential merits of designating genomics databases as critical national infrastructure.

The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Pat McFadden

Genomics is a great British success story, and our genomics databases are vital for world-leading life sciences and health research.

The organisations that have such databases have to provide data protection and security training, and have to make sure that researchers can access data only for approved purposes.

The opportunities come with risks, which is why the Government will always try to minimise the risks of biological data to protect our bio-economy. We are working on this issue across Government Departments and through our national security structures.

Mr Carmichael

I take it that genomics databases will not be designated as critical national infrastructure, then, which was the question.

As the Government seek to reset the relationship with China, will Ministers be mindful of the old maxim that you need a long-handled spoon to sup with the devil, and of the fact that Chinese genomics companies such as BGI do not behave as normal commercial competitors?

Will the Secretary of State ensure that the interests of British genomics are not left vulnerable as a consequence of any reset relationship?

Pat McFadden

The right hon. Member asks a very important question about the twin interests of national security and economic growth.

In this territory, we work with UK organisations that hold genomic data to make sure that they have robust data protection systems in place, and our security services give them advice on these matters on a regular basis, so that our pursuit of growth does not conflict with our very important national security objectives.

All content derived from official parliamentary records