05 Dec 2024
Question
Public Procurement Reform
1. ANALYSIS
Main Content & Structure
- Central Theme: The debate focuses on the reforms in public procurement to improve access and delivery for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
- Persistent Keywords: Procurement reform, SMEs, value for money, Government spending, late payments, Procurement Act 2023.
- Language & Terminology: Emphasizes on "value for money," "national procurement policy statement," and "public sector procurement efficiency."
Named Entities
- People: Katrina Murray, Bill Esterson, Euan Stainbank, Georgia Gould.
- Organizations: Conservative Party, Labour, Liberal Democrats, and DUP.
- Locations: Cumbernauld, Kirkintilloch, Sefton Central, Falkirk.
Policy Terms & Legislation
- Procurement Act 2023: Central legislative tool mentioned.
- National Insurance Job Tax: Referenced by Richard Holden regarding its impact on costs.
Numerical Data and Statistics
- Financial Figures: £300 billion on procurement annually, £400 billion procurement spending last year.
- Targets: Mention of saving targets without precise figures from Georgia Gould.
Related Parliamentary Business
- Contextual References: Engagement with small businesses, chancellor announcements, late payment policies.
- Scrutiny & Criticism: Focus on government's efficiency in spending and lessons from past government actions during COVID.
Political Positions & Policy Stances
- Labour's Focus: Support and enhance SME participation in public procurement and crack down on past inefficiencies.
- Conservative's Perspective: Mention of previous, perceived inefficiencies in the last government's policies.
Key Dates and Timeframes
- Act Commencement: February 2025 for significant procurement policy changes.
2. SPEAKER POINTS
Katrina Murray (Labour - Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch)
- Main Argument: Emphasizes collaboration with local authorities for small business opportunities.
- Key Statements: Highlighted the importance of local council engagement.
- Position: Pro-small business support in partnership with public entities.
Bill Esterson (Labour - Sefton Central)
- Main Argument: Critical of past government procurement practices.
- Key Statements: Asserted previous government's failure in giving contracts to SMEs.
- Position: Advocates for direct contracts with SMEs for economic benefits.
Euan Stainbank (Labour - Falkirk)
- Main Argument: Stressed value for money for taxpayers amidst fiscal challenges.
- Key Statements: Called for accountability and transparency in procurement spending.
- Position: Firm advocate for efficient and transparent fiscal practices.
Georgia Gould (Labour - Queen's Park and Maida Vale)
- Role: Opposition's key figure on procurement reform.
- Main Argument: Advocates restructuring of public procurement to ensure efficiency.
- Key Statements: Emphasized transparency, reducing fraud, and supporting SMEs.
- Position: Committed to rectifying inefficiencies and ensuring fair SME participation.
- Terminology: Frequent mention of "efficiency," "transparency," and "late payments."
Max Wilkinson (Liberal Democrats - Cheltenham)
- Main Argument: Focused on the potential benefits for specific sectors, like cybersecurity.
- Key Statements: Highlighted risk of talent loss to other cities.
- Position: Supports benefits to SMEs in niche sectors through improved policies.
James Wild (Conservative - North West Norfolk)
- Main Argument: Query on actual savings targets.
- Key Statements: Pressed for government transparency on intended savings from procurement reforms.
- Position: Inquisitive, mildly critical stance towards Labour's handling.
Jim Shannon (DUP - Strangford)
- Main Argument: Advocated for domestic procurement emphasis.
- Key Statements: Asked about measures to rely less on international partners.
- Position: Strong proponent of domestic support measures.
Each speaker engages with overarching themes of the debate, expressing differing views on procurement reform, focusing on accountability, inclusivity for SMEs, and addressing past inefficiencies in governmental spending. The proceedings highlight the commitment to reform while also addressing prior shortcomings, emphasizing legislative foresight into 2025 with the Procurement Act.
Key Contributions
Original Transcript
All content derived from official parliamentary records