04 Mar
Westminster Hall
Community Sport Facilities

The Westminster Hall debate chaired by Sir Jeremy Wright was centered on the crucial issue of community sport facilities. Andy MacNae, MP for Rossendale and Darwen, advocated strongly for improved access and funding for community sports facilities, emphasizing their potential to enhance community health, reduce crime, and stimulate local economies. He highlighted the detrimental impacts of austerity on smaller local authorities, specifically in towns like his own, where limited sporting facilities contribute to social inequalities. MacNae called for funding structures that align with community needs and are adaptable to changing opportunities.

£4 billion

Economic value of providing physical activity in primary schools under the Treasury's wellbeing measures.

Andy MacNae detailed the positive impacts of community sports through programs like RugbyWorks and Rossendale Works, showcasing their success in educational engagement and reducing economic inactivity. He argued for a long-term funding strategy to ensure such programs' continuity and effectiveness. Additionally, MacNae advocated for community empowerment through sports facility ownership, citing successful local examples such as the Junction 4 Skatepark's potential BMX and skateboard academy.

56 billion per year

Cost of poor mental health to the economy.

Throughout the debate, the strong economic and health benefits of investing in sports were reiterated, emphasizing the cost-saving potential for the NHS and the significant reductions in health conditions due to active lifestyles.

63% older

Percentage of sports halls and swimming pools over ten years old.

4 to 1

Social and health benefits return for every £1 invested in sport.

Outcome

The debate concluded with a firm acknowledgment from Government representatives of the critical role that community sports facilities play in public health and community engagement. Stephanie Peacock, the Minister responding to the debate, reiterated the Government's commitment to supporting community sports facilities despite prevailing financial pressures. She highlighted ongoing and future investments into grassroots sports facilities targeting areas with high needs and acknowledged the current constraints faced by smaller local authorities. The session ended on an optimistic note with cross-party agreement on the need for comprehensive strategies for community engagement through sports.

Key Contributions

Sir Jeremy WrightChair
in the Chair

Initiated proceedings, managed the flow of the debate, and concluded the session after questions were put and agreed to.

Andy MacNaeMP
Labour

Highlighted the untapped potential of community sport facilities to contribute to economic growth.

Jim ShannonMP
DUP

Acknowledged rising obesity and connection to lack of access to sporting facilities.

Sarah HallMP
Labour

Supported the idea of community ownership of sports clubs.

Stephanie PeacockMinister

Outlined the Government's commitment to investing in grassroots sports facilities.

Original Transcript
Sir Jeremy Wright
in the Chair

I will call Andy MacNae to move the motion and then call the Minister to respond. There will not be an opportunity for the Member in charge to wind up, as is the convention for a 30-minute debate.

Andy MacNae
Rossendale and Darwen
Lab
11:00

I beg to move, That this House has considered community sport facilities. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Jeremy. I am grateful for the Minister’s attendance today, and for all the work that she and the Government are doing to champion community sports facilities.

I and many colleagues believe that easily accessible sports facilities have a huge untapped potential to contribute not just to the vibrancy of communities, but to the missions that the Government have set out to achieve.

To deliver on that, we need to align funding and partnerships with need, opportunity and impact. As a non-statutory service, local leisure provision has been disproportionately hit by years of austerity.

That is especially true in the case of smaller local authorities, which lack the capacity and resilience to mitigate the cuts. The impact is particularly felt in our small towns, where hollowed-out local services amplify the feeling of being left behind.

Young people in small towns rightly say, “There is nothing here for us to do,” looking with envy towards distant big towns and cities and asking, “Why do they always seem to get the money?

” In this debate I will argue that we must have an approach to sports and leisure that properly values the benefits of active lives while addressing the increasing inequality of provision and being agile enough to respond to opportunity when it comes.

I will start by considering the wide-ranging benefits and impacts in support of our missions. First, well-tailored sports programmes centred around local facilities can help to drive economic growth and unlock opportunity.

We know that sport builds confidence and resilience in young people, equipping them for work and helping them to break down the barriers to opportunity. If we want to see the next generation thrive, they need the confidence to seize the opportunities before them.

Regular sports and physical activity provide an excellent way of embedding that confidence while growing teamwork and leadership skills.

The Youth Sport Trust has provided strong evidence for that, demonstrating that sport is a key predictor of children’s self-confidence and resilience, with girls receiving an even greater positive impact from sports than boys.

The trust finds that the economic value of providing physical activity in primary schools alone is worth at least £4 billion under the Treasury’s wellbeing measures, but the economic benefits of physical activity through improving health, wellbeing and resilience are doubled for children who are either disabled or receiving free school meals.

In addition, sports can provide strong and unique incentives for people to continue coming to school.

RugbyWorks supports young people excluded from mainstream education; its term-time programme offers participation in key stage 3 and key stage 4, with a year-long intervention underpinned by the four pillars of its theory of change, including developing life skills, raising aspirations, improving physical wellbeing and focusing on mental wellbeing.

Jim Shannon
Strangford
DUP
11:03

I commend the hon. Member for securing this debate. He is absolutely right to set the scene very clearly for community sports facilities. Obesity seems to be rising in the United Kingdom. Does he feel that access to sporting facilities would reduce obesity?

Rural bus connections to the community centres are also part of the issue, because if people cannot get there, the centres will not be much good to anybody.

Sarah Hall
Warrington South
Lab/Co-op
11:10

Does my hon.

Friend agree that community asset transfers offer a real opportunity for grassroots clubs such as mine in Warrington South, allowing for the enhancement of community facilities while also giving local people a stake in how their clubs are run, putting people over profit and retaining an identity rooted in the community?

Sir Jeremy Wright
in the Chair

I thank the Minister, who has worked a double shift this morning. Question put and agreed to.

All content derived from official parliamentary records