22 Apr
Question
Legal Aid

The debate session centered on the topic of legal aid provision across the UK. Dr Rupa Huq opened with a question reflecting the need for increased provision of legal aid services, highlighting systemic deficiencies and expressing concerns over local access in her constituency, Ealing Central and Acton. Sarah Sackman responded by acknowledging past challenges inherited by the current government across numerous criminal justice areas, including legal aid. She mentioned recent governmental actions, specifically the announcement of substantial funding increases to support the legal aid system.

£92 million

Annual increase for criminal legal aid solicitors and duty solicitor support.

Sackman's substantive response detailed the allocation of up to £92 million more annually for criminal legal aid solicitors, with an additional £20 million earmarked for housing and immigration legal aid fees, representing a significant policy shift. In follow-up, Dr Huq, while welcoming the funding, pressed for assurances that these funds would directly benefit her constituents. Sackman responded affirmatively, assuring Dr Huq that the Legal Aid Agency reviews contracts continuously to ensure national provision, including areas like Ealing. She emphasized that the additional support would cover a range of advice services to improve overall access to justice.

£24 million

Previously announced funding for duty solicitors in police stations.

The session was marked by the seeking and obtaining of specific commitments on funding distribution and local accessibility, underscoring a proactive approach to legislative accountability.

£20 million

Proposed increase for housing and immigration legal aid fees, first since 1996.

Outcome

The debate underscored a commitment to enhancing legal aid services, with new funding allocations announced aimed at remedying historical inadequacies attributed to previous administrations. Key outcomes include assurances of improved local service provision, proactive government measures, and boosted funding for civil legal aid, marking a significant shift in policy support.

Key Contributions

Dr Rupa HuqLabor, MP for Ealing Central and Acton
Labour

Questioned the government's steps to increase legal aid provision.

Sarah SackmanMinister responsible for legal aid

Acknowledged past issues with legal aid services and systemic historic inherited issues.

Original Transcript
Dr Rupa Huq
Ealing Central and Acton
Lab
Question
UIN: 903774

18. What steps she is taking to increase the provision of legal aid services.

Dr Huq
15:14

The Conservatives left legal aid in a mess, like so many other things, so I welcome the sums the Minister is announcing, but can she assure me that the money will reach Ealing?

We have never even had a citizens advice bureau—not in the 10 years I have been the MP, and not in the 50 years I have been on the planet—to refer constituents to. Can she assure us that my constituents can get the access to justice they deserve?

Sarah Sackman

I welcome my hon. Friend’s question. The Legal Aid Agency keeps contracts under review to ensure that there is provision right across the country, including in Ealing.

As I said earlier, the additional money going into legal support, which includes advice services, such as citizens advice bureaux, law centres and other advice providers, will reach constituents just like hers, both remotely and face to face.

All content derived from official parliamentary records