The recent Question session in the House of Commons revolved around the Church of England's Project Spire, with a focus on discussions between the Church Commissioners and the Charity Commission. Katie Lam, representing the Conservative Party from the Weald of Kent constituency, raised questions concerning the legitimacy of fund allocation related to the project. Marsha De Cordova addressed these queries, emphasizing informal dialogues with the Charity Commission about necessary regulatory approvals.

The session concentrated heavily on the Church's financial management, particularly regarding reparations connected to its historical ties to slavery. Lam underlined the importance of maintaining legality in fund allocation, signalling potential unauthorized use for goals divergent from parish church upkeep. De Cordova's response clarified that funds associated with "healing, repair, and justice" stem from the Church's endowment and will adhere to its charitable and legal framework.

Outcome: The discourse highlighted ongoing informal discussions as a crucial step prior to reaching any conclusive regulatory approval or fund allocation decision. It was acknowledged that the specific legalities of the fund usage and these communications were confidential at present, necessitating patience until formal decisions post-discussion were declared.

Statistics:

1. Endowment Fund: This initiative draws from the Church's endowment fund, though exact figures were not disclosed within the debate.
2. Repair Fund Purpose: Highlighted as a response to historical injustices linked to slavery, underscoring broader financial strategies at the Church of England.