The Question session focused on the accessibility and resources for Special Educational Needs (SEN) assessments. The session opened with Charlotte Cane inquiring about cross-departmental efforts to improve access to these assessments. Stephen Kinnock, responding on behalf of the government, addressed existing delays in service delivery attributed to prolonged austerity impacts on local authorities.
Kinnock highlighted initiatives such as the Partnerships for Inclusion of Neurodiversity in Schools (PINS) program with a budget of £13 million aimed at early intervention and support for neurodiverse students. Additionally, the development of a taskforce by NHS England to enhance support for conditions like ADHD was important.
Budget allocated to the Partnerships for Inclusion of Neurodiversity in Schools (PINS) programme.
Charlotte Cane further pointed out the funding disparities specific to Cambridgeshire, questioning whether high-growth areas with increased demand for SEN services could receive equitable financial support.
Kinnock responded by reinforcing the government's commitment to nationwide SEND improvement efforts, mentioning the early language support through the ELSEC programme aimed at identifying and supporting children with speech, language, and communication needs.
Under the Early Language Support for Every Child (ELSEC) programme aimed at speech, language, and communication support.
The discussion was further extended by Alistair Strathern, who highlighted the systemic under-prioritization by NHS trusts impacting children's health. Strathern urged for a prioritized approach within a broader NHS reform plan catering specifically to children with additional needs.
Kinnock again emphasized collaborative work among departments to enhance early health and educational intervention strategies, expressing his willingness to discuss these initiatives further.
Outcome
The session reaffirmed the government's commitment to enhancing SEN support and highlighted ongoing and future initiatives like PINS and ELSEC. Concerns about regional funding inequalities were acknowledged, though further scrutiny and follow-up actions were hinted at rather than explicitly committed to.
Key Contributions
Inquired about cross-governmental efforts to improve SEN assessment access. Expressed concern over cambridgeshire's low funding in GP and schools despite high demand for SEN and mental health services, urging government action to align funding with regional growth needs.
Clarified departmental efforts against service delays due to austerity, promoting PINS programmes, and mentioned NHS England's task force for ADHD. Reiterated universal commitment to SEN improvements and efforts to enhance early interventions through the ELSEC programme, emphasizing cross-agency collaboration.
Highlighted local authorities' resource challenges and NHS prioritization issues, asking how children’s health would be prioritized in the NHS reform plan.
All content derived from official parliamentary records