The question session focused on the proposed UK-Mauritius treaty, with particular emphasis on its implications for the sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) and the strategic military base on Diego Garcia. Security concerns were a dominant theme, especially regarding potential foreign influence, notably from China. The debate also touched on the negotiations timeline and the strategic importance of maintaining US-UK relations.
Security and operational integrity of the base continue under current proposals.
Concerns were raised about whether the treaty might inadvertently compromise Western security interests by allowing foreign installations or presence, particularly from adversarial nations. The Minister reassured the House that safeguards are in place to maintain control over Diego Garcia, emphasizing provisions that prevent adversary access.
Date of public announcement of the terms negotiated with Mauritius.
Criticism was directed at the perceived lenience of the deal, perceived by some as potentially ceding strategic advantage. The government defended its position, stressing the continuity and security of operations at the base. An internal disagreement was evident between MPs about the terms and implications of the treaty.
Outcome
The session highlighted a division among MPs regarding the UK's strategic priorities and the treaty's terms. While government representatives assuaged concerns by reaffirming control over Diego Garcia, opposition figures criticized the concession of terms to Mauritius. No definitive amendments or deadlines were agreed upon, but commitments to maintain operational security were confirmed.
Key Contributions
Questioned the potential security implications of the UK-Mauritius treaty on BIOT's sovereignty.
Inquired about the timetable for the transfer of Chagos sovereignty.
Countered the notion of giving away Diego Garcia.
Criticized concessions made to Mauritius.
All content derived from official parliamentary records