20 Mar
Question
Agricultural and Business Property Reliefs

The question session focused on the impending changes to Agricultural and Business Property Reliefs (APR and BPR) and their impact on farmers across the UK. David Reed initiated the session with a query on the estimated number of farmers affected by the changes, reflecting the widespread concerns about inheritance tax implications and the relief mechanisms available.

Daniel Zeichner explained that about 500 claims would be impacted by the new reforms annually. These changes introduced a reduced inheritance tax rate for farmers, allowing payments to be spread interest-free over a decade. Moreover, farm-owning couples could pass on substantial assets without incurring standard inheritance taxes.

Around 500 claims affected annually

Projected number of farmers impacted by the reforms.

Reed expressed frustration over perceived neglect from DEFRA ministers towards Devon's farming concerns. He highlighted the non-responsiveness to his invitations to discuss the APR and BPR changes and warned of an informational void as the changes approached implementation.

Robbie Moore slammed the changes, suggesting an overwhelming dissatisfaction within the farming community and pressing Zeichner for evidence of farmer support for the reforms. He warned of a broader assault on farming cash flows because of various governmental policies.

20% reduced inheritance tax rate

New rate applied to farmers compared to the standard 40% rate.

Tim Farron underscored the adverse impact on farmers in disadvantaged upland areas, citing dramatic drops in farm incomes, particularly for hill farmers. He urged a reassessment of the schemes and called for an 'uplands reward' to support struggling farmers in these regions.

Zeichner defended the reforms by asserting the distribution of increased stewardship payments to alleviate the burden on farmers in specific disadvantaged regions.

£5 billion

Total committed government budget for farming over two years.

Outcome

The session underscored the pronounced divisions between government representatives and opposition MPs regarding the fairness and adequacy of the proposed changes to the APR and BPR systems. Despite assurances from the government to improve relief mechanisms and provide strategic support to once-neglected areas, opposition members remained critical, pointing to current inadequacies in the rollout and consultation processes.

Key Contributions

David ReedConservative MP
Conservative

Queried how many farmers would be affected by changes to agricultural and business property reliefs.

Daniel ZeichnerMP
Labour

Outlined the reforms impacting 500 claims annually, reducing inheritance tax to 20%.

Robbie MooreConservative MP
Conservative

Criticized alleged government disregard for farmer concerns about APR and BPR changes.

Tim FarronLiberal Democrats MP
Liberal Democrats

Highlighted the impact of APR changes on upland farmers, who face significant challenges due to low incomes.

Original Transcript
David Reed
Exmouth and Exeter East
Con
Question
UIN: 903289

3. What estimate he has made of the number of farmers affected by changes to agricultural and business property reliefs.

The Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs
Daniel Zeichner
09:47

Around 500 claims each year will be impacted. Our reforms will mean that farmers will pay a reduced inheritance tax rate of 20%, rather than the standard 40%, and payments can be spread over 10 years interest free. Farm-owning couples can pass on up to £3 million without paying inheritance tax.

In our view, this is a fair and balanced approach, and should be seen against the backdrop of the Government committing £5 billion for farming over two years—the largest budget directed at sustainable food production and nature’s recovery in our country’s history.

Daniel Zeichner

I hear the hon. Gentleman’s complaint, but I have been to Devon in my role before, and I will come to Devon again. I am always happy to meet farmers.

I have spent quite a lot of time at this Dispatch Box answering questions from Conservative Members, so perhaps fewer questions will mean more time to go out and meet farmers.

Madam Deputy Speaker
Ms Nusrat Ghani
09:48

I call the shadow Minister.

Robbie Moore
Keighley and Ilkley
Con

Back in November, the farming Minister unbelievably said from the Government Dispatch Box that it was striking how many people were coming up to him at farming events and saying, “You’re right to be making these changes to APR and BPR.

” Conservative Members have been out and about all over the country; indeed, I was in Staffordshire, Warwickshire and Shropshire yesterday, and I have not found one farmer who thinks that he is right.

In fact, the level of anger and sheer disbelief among our farming community is immense as this Government’s attack on our farming cash flows continues through the dramatic reduction in delinked payments, the sudden stop of the sustainable farming incentive and the rise in employer’s national insurance contributions—I could go on.

Business confidence is at an all-time low, so can the Minister provide the name of just one farmer he has spoken to who thinks he and his Government are right to be pursuing these changes?

Daniel Zeichner

I suggest that the shadow Minister goes out and speaks to a few more people, because I was stopped in a local village just this weekend and encouraged —[Interruption.] I am not going to name names, but he should check with some of his Conservative candidates in elections.

They said, “Keep on going, you are doing the right thing.” The situation is not as the shadow Minister describes. He might do well to look at the figures for projected farm business incomes for this year, which show that in many sectors, those business incomes are doing rather well.

That probably explains why people are not as exercised about it as him.

Madam Deputy Speaker
Ms Nusrat Ghani
09:50

I call the Liberal Democrats spokesperson.

Tim Farron
Westmorland and Lonsdale
LD
09:50

Is the Minister aware that some of the farmers who will be worst hit by the APR changes are those who farm in severely disadvantaged areas in the uplands around our country, where typically property values are high and incomes are extremely low?

When the change was made just last week with people being excluded from the sustainable farming incentive, 6,100 people had entered the SFI in this session, and only 40 of them were hill farmers.

Is he also aware that his own Department’s figures show that at the end of the transition, the average hill farm income will be 55% of the national minimum wage? Does he not understand that his changes are bringing harm to the poorest farmers in the prettiest places, such as mine?

Will he undertake to look at the Liberal Democrat proposal to bring in an uplands reward so that we do not plunge into poverty those people who care for our precious landscapes?

Daniel Zeichner

The hon. Gentleman always speaks with passion about his constituents, and I absolutely understand those concerns. He is right to say that the schemes we inherited did not reward those areas as well as they should.

That is why in our announcement a few weeks ago, we increased the higher level stewardship payments by £30 million, which will be of particular advantage to people in his area. I agree with him, and the schemes we inherited were not good enough. That is why we are revising them.

All content derived from official parliamentary records