22 Apr
Question
Bail Guidelines

The Question session in the House of Commons centered around the discussion on bail guidelines, specifically the need for reviewing existing regulations governing judges' discretion on bail decisions, particularly in cases involving serious sexual offenses. Robbie Moore raised an issue impacting his constituency, prompting a detailed exchange on the adequacy of current bail conditions and their enforcement. Shabana Mahmood's responses indicated an acknowledgment of the constraints within the existing legal structure while affirming a proactive approach toward policy review and reform.

Outcome

The outcome of the session leaned towards an agreement in considering a review or at least a discussion on the bail guidelines. The debate underscored the precarious balance between judicial independence and ensuring stringent measures to prevent absconding offenders, particularly in serious criminal cases involving foreign nationals.

Key Contributions

Robbie Moore
Conservative

Highlighted the case of eight men convicted of child rape charges in his constituency, with two absconding due to inadequate bail conditions.

Shabana Mahmood

Acknowledged the seriousness of the crimes and the issues caused by offenders absconding, aligned with the judiciary's broad discretion on bail decisions.

Original Transcript
Robbie Moore
Keighley and Ilkley
Con
Question
UIN: 903772

16. If she will have discussions with the HM Prison and Probation Service on the potential merits of reviewing its guidelines on bail.

The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
Shabana Mahmood

Equality before the law is a cornerstone of our justice system, and my position on this is clear. Later today, this House will debate legislation to overturn guidelines that the last Conservative Government welcomed, and I am not stopping there.

I am reviewing current policy, and this guidance is being redrafted as we speak, including on the approach to bail information for courts.

Robbie Moore

After the conviction of eight men for a string of horrendous child rape offences in Keighley, I wish I could stand here and say that justice has been fully served, but I cannot, because two of these men—dual nationals—absconded during their trial, are still evading justice and are known to be abroad.

Does the Secretary of State agree that in such serious cases, where dual or foreign nationals are charged with the most grotesque and serious sexual crimes against children, the court should be under a duty to impose stricter bail conditions, including surrendering passports and electronic monitoring, or even to provide no bail conditions, to stop them fleeing the country and evading justice?

All content derived from official parliamentary records