The debate centered on the critical issue of defendants absconding before their trial, highlighted by Robbie Moore MP. The exchange brought focus to the responsibilities and frameworks in judicial processes that are relevant to preventing such occurrences, particularly in severe cases of child exploitation.

Sir Nicholas Dakin responded by detailing the judiciary's prerogatives in determining bail conditions. He underscored that current measures allow courts to apply stringent conditions such as electronic monitoring and curfews to mitigate the risk of absconding. These responses were indicative of the government's stance on maintaining a robust legal framework to ensure justice is served.

Robbie Moore raised concerns specific to his constituency, referencing a case involving convicted child rapists who managed to flee justice. Moore's inquiry solicited a more rigorous approach in dealing with dual or foreign nationals in such cases, demanding stricter bail conditions to prevent international escape.

Sir Nicholas Dakin acknowledged the historic nature of the mentioned case, affirming its trial was concluded under a previous administration. However, he pointed to current government initiatives, emphasizing legislative action via the Crime and Policing Bill to aggravate penalties for child sexual offences involving grooming. This showcased ongoing efforts to tighten the legal net against such heinous crimes.