20 Mar
Question
Flood-prone Communities: Cumbria

The parliamentary question session on flood-prone communities in Cumbria raised critical issues concerning flood defence investments, asset use by water companies, and the holistic management of water resources in the UK. The debate, hosted at the House of Commons, involved examining the impact of flooding across Cumbria, including efforts by local action groups and infrastructural strategies by water companies to utilize reservoirs as flood mitigation systems.

Key discussions centered around the £2.65 billion government commitment for flood defence, with a special focus on a local initiative in Keswick involving the Thirlmere reservoir. Markus Campbell-Savours brought forward an important concern regarding the statutory roles of water companies in managing their assets for flood protection.

£2.65 billion

Amount pledged by the government for national flood defences.

Emma Hardy responded by highlighting a comprehensive approach to water management being evaluated through the Sir John Cunliffe review, emphasizing the need to balance water availability for communities while preventing floods and droughts.

£5.2 billion

Long-term investment in flood protection announced by the Conservative Government.

Dr Neil Hudson raised additional concerns about the broader rural challenges exacerbated by flooding, including the mental health implications and disease outbreaks. He criticized the current Labour Government's policies which allegedly undermine mental health support for rural communities.

Emma Hardy acknowledged the significance of mental health impacts due to flooding and highlighted the government's efforts by investing in mental health charities specifically targeting rural communities.

600,000 properties

Number of properties reportedly protected from flooding by existing defences.

£100 million

Dedicated funding for the frequently flooded allowance.

Outcome

The session concluded with a commitment to further explore the potential role of water companies in flood prevention and assurances of ongoing discussions about mental health support in flood-prone rural areas. Further cross-party collaboration on mental health support was encouraged, with emphasis on enhancing local and national infrastructure responses.

Key Contributions

Markus Campbell-Savours
Labour

Asked the Minister about government actions to protect flood-prone communities in Cumbria.

Emma Hardy

Praised flood action group efforts and acknowledged the importance of local initiatives.

Dr Neil HudsonShadow Minister
Conservative

Outlined the Conservative Government's achievements in flood protection investments.

Original Transcript
Markus Campbell-Savours
Penrith and Solway
Lab
Question
UIN: 903292

6. What steps he is taking to protect flood-prone communities in Cumbria.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Emma Hardy

As I may have already mentioned, we are putting in a record £2.65 billion investment to build, maintain and improve flood defences up and down the country, which shows this Government’s commitment to making sure that our communities and our farmland are protected from flooding.

Markus Campbell-Savours

I thank the Minister for her answer.

Communities in Cumbria have seen many devastating floods over the last two decades, but flood action groups in Keswick have worked hard with United Utilities to develop a scheme that uses Thirlmere reservoir as a storm water store, helping to prevent flooding in the town.

All agree that more could be done. Although I applaud their work, I note that there is no statutory requirement for water companies to use their assets as flood defences. Will the Minister look at how water companies’ assets can be used to prevent flooding across the country?

Emma Hardy

I am grateful not only for the work that my hon. Friend’s action flood group does, but for the work that flood action groups do right across the whole of his constituency. He raises an incredibly important and interesting issue.

In the Sir John Cunliffe review, we are fundamentally looking at the management of water right across entire catchment areas.

When we think about water management, we need to consider not only whether communities have enough water to meet their needs, but whether they have protection from flooding and drought. A holistic way of dealing with some of the challenges we face is certainly one of the answers going forward.

My hon. Friend has given a great example, and I would be happy to explore it further with him.

Madam Deputy Speaker

I call the shadow Minister.

Dr Neil Hudson
Epping Forest
Con

The Conservative Government protected over 600,000 properties from flooding, introduced the £100 million frequently flooded allowance and committed to a £5.2 billion investment in flood protection. However, we know that the mental health impacts of flooding remain long after the waters subside.

Rural communities face unique challenges, including outbreaks of diseases such as avian influenza and foot and mouth—a clear and worrying threat, given the recent cases in Germany and Hungary.

Unfortunately, this Labour Government are exacerbating such stresses with their family farm tax and by scrapping the farming resilience fund, which supports mental health.

Can the Minister confirm, for the sake of mental health, what support will be offered to rural communities in place of the scrapped fund?

Emma Hardy

That all started so well—we nearly managed to get through the question with me agreeing with the hon. Gentleman. He is quite right about this issue, which he has mentioned before.

I am in complete agreement with him about the impact of flooding on mental health, and I know that we all take it seriously.

We are investing £500,000 in mental health charities to support rural communities, but I completely recognise the devastation that flooding causes, and I am always happy to work with Members from across the House on how we can support people’s mental health.

All content derived from official parliamentary records